Skip to main content
· 2/23/1972

Whitehead v. Julian

Citations

  • 476 S.W.2d 844
  • 15 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 207
  • 1972 Tex. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a $50 expense allowance does not render an office lucrative if expenses exceed the allowance
  • holding that a $50 expense allowance does not render an office lucrative if expenses exceed the allowance
  • expense allowance does not make office a \lucrative office\; salary, fees, or other compensation must be paid
  • mayor who received only $50 monthly expense allowance and whose expenses exceeded the allowance did not hold a lucrative office within the meaning of art. III, 9 19
  • expense allowance paid tcs city mayor does not make position a \lucrative\ office within meaning of art. III, P19, Tex. Const., making the holder of a l.ucrative office ineligible for state legislature
  • expense allowance paid to city mayor does not make position a \lucrative\ office within meaning of art. III , § 19 , Tex. Const., making the holder of a lucrative office ineligible for state legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGEE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.