White v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when an MSA is ambiguous or unclear, the circuit court “may consider extrinsic evidence as well as the parties’ interpretation of the contract to explain or clarify the language.”
• when an MSA is ambiguous or unclear, the circuit court “may consider extrinsic evidence as well as the parties’ interpretation of the contract to explain or clarify the language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• ANGELA KAY KIRSCHNER n/k/a ANGELA KAY RAMSIER v. JONATHAN JAY KIRSCHNER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-25· cited 1×
• JULIE WOHLBERG v. MICHAEL CONNER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-10
• ANGELA KAY KIRSCHNER n/k/a ANGELA KAY RAMSIER v. JONATHAN JAY KIRSCHNER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kipp v. Kipp
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-23· cited 40×
• Levitt v. Levitt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-27· cited 26×
• McIlmoil v. McIlmoil
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-15· cited 24×
• Reilly v. Reilly
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-15· cited 20×
• Jones v. Treasure
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-18· cited 9×