Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/11/1973
White v. White
Citations
- 226 Pa. Super. 499
- 313 A.2d 776
- 1973 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considerations in determining “employability” include amount of time the wife has been out of work, availability of work, relative skills of the worker, health and stamina of the worker, and absence of children in the home
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weight, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Spaeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-01-28· cited 90×
- Straub v. TyahlaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-18· cited 40×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Travitzky v. TravitzkySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-09-23· cited 34×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Armor v. ArmorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-29· cited 27×
- Prozzoly v. ProzzolySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-27· cited 27×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Kaplan v. KaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 18×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Caplan v. CaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-28· cited 17×
- In Re Estate of SmidSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-08-13· cited 15×
- Horn v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-10-02· cited 14×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Simpson v. SimpsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-22· cited 12×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Malizia v. MaliziaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-06-21· cited 11×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cragle v. CragleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-11· cited 7×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Powelson v. PowelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-25· cited 7×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Littman v. LittmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-03· cited 4×
- In Re Estate of SlightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-06· cited 4×
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-08-15· cited 4×
- Urban v. UrbanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-16· cited 4×
- Sorbello v. SorbelloCumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1981-08-25· cited 1×
- George v. GeorgeCarbon County Court of Common Pleas· 1974-10-30
- Com. v. RitterCumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1980-05-07
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ross v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-09-16· cited 26×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hanerkam v. HanerkamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-04-17· cited 20×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Borrow v. BorrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-11-15· cited 18×
- Commonwealth ex rel. McCuff v. McCuffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-11-16· cited 16×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Young v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-11-14· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. DoughtySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-09-11· cited 15×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-06-13· cited 15×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Krouse v. KrouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-03-24· cited 13×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Haimowitz v. HaimowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-15· cited 13×
- Com. Ex Rel. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-06-13· cited 12×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Keeth v. KeethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-04-13· cited 11×
- Walbert v. FarinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-07-02· cited 10×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lazarou v. LazarouSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-01-17· cited 10×
- Seery v. SeerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-05-03· cited 9×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Jablonski v. JablonskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-11-16· cited 6×
- Commonwealth ex rel. DiSanti v. DiSantiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.