White v. Starr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring continuous possession “so that the possession of the true owner shall not constructively intervene”
• construing Compiled Laws of Alaska § 3354, the territorial predecessor of AS 09.10.030
• requiring only “a continuous possession by mutual consent” among adverse possessors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).