· 5/31/1994
White v. Southern California Edison Co.
Citations
- 25 Cal. App. 4th 442
- 30 Cal. Rptr. 431
- 30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 431
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4071
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 7307
- 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 548
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that the utility owed no contractual or common law duty to moped driver injured in a collision that occurred at an intersection where streetlights were not functioning
- interpreting Langley to mean that a utility has “a general duty to exercise reasonable care in the management of its personal and real property”
- noting \the large number of streetlights\ and \the likelihood that streetlights will become periodically inoperable\ in holding that the 24 SC-2024-0700 defendant did not owe the plaintiff a legal duty to maintain streetlights that the defendant had contracted to maintain
- “Duty is an allocation of risk determined by balancing the foreseeability of harm, in light of all of the circumstances, against the burden to be imposed.”
- duty “determined by balancing the foreseeability of harm, in light of all the circumstances, against the burden to be imposed”
- duty is “determined by balancing the foreseeability of harm, in light of all the circumstances, against the burden to be imposed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grignon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.