Skip to main content
· 5/31/1994

White v. Southern California Edison Co.

Citations

  • 25 Cal. App. 4th 442
  • 30 Cal. Rptr. 431
  • 30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 431
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4071
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 7307
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the utility owed no contractual or common law duty to moped driver injured in a collision that occurred at an intersection where streetlights were not functioning
  • interpreting Langley to mean that a utility has “a general duty to exercise reasonable care in the management of its personal and real property”
  • noting \the large number of streetlights\ and \the likelihood that streetlights will become periodically inoperable\ in holding that the 24 SC-2024-0700 defendant did not owe the plaintiff a legal duty to maintain streetlights that the defendant had contracted to maintain
  • “Duty is an allocation of risk determined by balancing the foreseeability of harm, in light of all of the circumstances, against the burden to be imposed.”
  • duty “determined by balancing the foreseeability of harm, in light of all the circumstances, against the burden to be imposed”
  • duty is “determined by balancing the foreseeability of harm, in light of all the circumstances, against the burden to be imposed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grignon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.