White v. Smith & Wesson Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• contradicting the state court's ruling in City of Cincinnati v. Beretta, which was subsequently affirmed on appeal
• allowing unjust-enrichment claim where city sued gun manufacturer for failing to incorporate safety devices into handguns and negligent marketing practices
• contradicting the state court’s ruling in City of Cincinnati v. Beretta, which was subsequently affirmed on appeal
• allowing unjust-enrichment claim where city sued gun manufacturer for failing to incorporate safety devices into handguns and negligent marketing practices
• Cleveland has standing to sue for cost of abating public nuisance generated by gun manufacturers’ faulty handgun design
• “In order to maintain a cause of action for unjust enrichment under Ohio law, a plaintiff must allege: (1) a benefit conferred by a plaintiff upon a defendant; (2) knowledge by the defendant of the benefit; and, (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).