White v. Simonson & Cohen P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “by sending out one mailing of thirty-five collection letters in nearly four decades of practice, defendant cannot be said to ‘regularly collectf ] ... debts’ ”
• law firm that sent 35 debt collection letters on behalf of a client, litigating none of them, was not a \debt collector\ within the meaning of the FDCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).