Second Circuit· 10/14/1993

White v. Shalala

Citations

7 F.3d 296
126 A.L.R. Fed. 767
1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “SSR 82–31 is an interpretive as opposed to a legislative rule” and thus “not subject to the notice and comment requirements of the APA”
reviewing reasonableness of agency’s interpretation by analyzing statute’s language and legislative intent
noting a “special need” to defer to HHS’s interpretation of the Act
reviewing reasonableness of agency's interpretation by analyzing statute's language and legislative intent
noting a \special need\ to defer to HHS's interpretation of the Act
“[A]n interpretive rule changing an agency’s interpretation of a statute is not magically transformed into a legislative rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.