White v. PennDOT

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in our two-part inquiry, we “must determine whether the original bases for jurisdiction continue to pose a current threat of serious loss or injury,” and then “assess the like- lihood that that risk will be realized”
• explaining that in our two-part inquiry, we “must determine whether the original bases for jurisdiction continue to pose a current threat of serious loss or injury,” and then “assess the like- lihood that that risk will be realized”
• explaining how a parent’s plan for caregiver help can be probative to the factfinder’s inquiry
• describing the two-part inquiry involved in a motion to dismiss dependency jurisdiction
• setting out “two-part inquiry” for evaluating motions to dismiss dependency jurisdiction
• “The permanency plan set by the court determines whether DHS will continue to work to reunify the family * * *.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).