White v. Patton
Citations
- 87 Cal. 151
- 25 P. 270
- 1890 Cal. LEXIS 1110
Syllabus
<p>Foreclosure of Mortgage — Pleading — Answer of Subsequent Mortgagee—Cross-comblaint— Service — Default.—In proceedings for the foreclosure of a mortgage, the answer of a subsequent mortgagee, which sets up a junior mortgage and prays for a foreclosure thereof, must be treated as a cross-complaint, and must be served upon all the parties affected thereby, including the mortgagor, though he has made default upon the original complaint.</p> <p>Id. —Judgment by Default — Jurisdiction — Appeal. —Where such service is not made, the court has no jurisdiction to render judgment of foreclosure by default in favor of the subsequent mortgagee, even though the parties against whom the default was taken were properly served with summons issued, on the original complaint and had failed to appear; and the error in rendering such judgment will be corrected upon appeal from the judgment by default.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- three-year suspension or suspension for the probation period, whichever was longer, for two felony false imprisonment convictions
- three-year suspension or suspension for the probation period, whichever was longer, for two felony false imprisonment convictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.