Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1/19/2000
White v. Panic
Citations
- 793 A.2d 356
- 2000 Del. Ch. LEXIS 14
- 2000 WL 33709848
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing Caremark claim after noting that the plaintiff failed to use Section 220
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lerner v. PrinceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-05-22· cited 115×
- Beam Ex Rel. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v. StewartCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2003-09-30· cited 89×
- Weiss v. SwansonCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2008-03-07· cited 79×
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. PyottCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2012-06-11· cited 59×
- In Re IAC/InterActiveCorp Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2007-03-21· cited 40×
- Highland Select Equity Fund, L.P. v. Motient Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2006-07-06· cited 29×
- Johnson v. GlassmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2008-03-05· cited 18×
- In Re Forest Laboratories, Inc. Derivative LitigationS.D. New York· 2006-09-18· cited 15×
- King v. BaldinoD. Delaware· 2009-08-26· cited 13×
- In Re Crown Castle International Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-01-29· cited 13×
- King v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2010-05-12· cited 13×
- Caviness v. EvansD. Massachusetts· 2005-08-18· cited 7×
- In Re Pozen S'holders Litig.North Carolina Business Court· 2005-11-10· cited 6×
- Sachs v. SpragueD. Massachusetts· 2005-11-22· cited 3×
- In re Discovery Laboratories Derivative LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-05-01· cited 3×
- In re Biglari Holdings, Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationS.D. Indiana· 2015-03-18· cited 2×
- Demoulas ex rel. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2004-08-02· cited 2×
- Lambrecht v. O'NealS.D. New York· 2011-03-28· cited 2×
- In re Sonus Networks, Inc. Derivative LitigationMassachusetts Superior Court· 2004-09-27· cited 1×
- In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Delaware Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2016-05-13
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 6,226×
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 4,775×
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-12-23· cited 768×
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1996-09-25· cited 387×
- Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-05-01· cited 325×
- In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-11-22· cited 306×
- Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-03-15· cited 295×
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware· 1996-04-11· cited 233×
- Lewis v. CurtisThird Circuit· 1982-03-03· cited 194×
- Security First Corp. v. U.S. Die Casting & Development Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1997-01-14· cited 112×
- In Re the Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1998-10-07· cited 76×
- Heineman v. Datapoint Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1992-08-05· cited 64×
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1946-05-10· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.