White v. MP 40 Realty Mgt. LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]hile DeGrandechamp [sic] established that she was reasonably certain to incur at least some medical expenses in the future, we can find no evidentiary basis to support the amount of the jury’s award in this case”
• finding that doctor’s testimony that plaintiff would “possibly” need surgery was insufficient to support jury award of future medical expenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).