White v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, despite no challenge to the Rule 54(b) certification, the Court of Appeals plainly erred by entertaining the appeal
• holding the grant of summary judgment was “not a true Rule 54(b) judgment” because it “left a portion of the claim pending—i.e., that portion dealing with the relief due”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).