Skip to main content
· 12/10/1889

White v. Merrill

Citations

  • 82 Cal. 14
  • 22 P. 1129
  • 1889 Cal. LEXIS 793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • co-defendant’s confession and incriminating statements, which were consistent with information gained from independent investigation, provided officers probable cause to conclude that defendant had committed a crime
  • co- defendant’s confession and incriminating statements, which were consistent with information gained from independent investigation, provided officers probable cause to conclude that defendant had committed a crime
  • conduct of a defendant before, during, and after the commission of a crime may be considered by the jury in establishing his intention and his participation, to determine whether such intent and conduct were sufficient corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fox, McFarland, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.