· 12/10/1889
White v. Merrill
Citations
- 82 Cal. 14
- 22 P. 1129
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 793
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- co-defendant’s confession and incriminating statements, which were consistent with information gained from independent investigation, provided officers probable cause to conclude that defendant had committed a crime
- co- defendant’s confession and incriminating statements, which were consistent with information gained from independent investigation, provided officers probable cause to conclude that defendant had committed a crime
- conduct of a defendant before, during, and after the commission of a crime may be considered by the jury in establishing his intention and his participation, to determine whether such intent and conduct were sufficient corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fox, McFarland, Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.