White v. Lambert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that courl “need not address the non-use of a deeded easement question,” despite evidence that a portion of the easement area had never been used by easement holders
• determining as sufficient to constitute adverse possession claimants’ activities of using the property as their lawn, planting shrubs and trees, burying a waterline, and building a shed
• servient owners extinguished part of an express right-of-way by erecting a fence along the road and maintaining grass, shrubs, trees, and a shed within the unused portion of the easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).