Skip to main content
· 10/13/2009

White v. HENG LY LIM

Citations

  • 2009 OK 79
  • 224 P.3d 679
  • 2009 Okla. LEXIS 84
  • 2009 WL 3261700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that RPCDA provides exclusive civil remedy for nondisclosures in conjunction with sale of residential property, where plaintiffs originally brought tort claims for fraud and sought rescission of the agreement
  • holding that RPCDA provides exclusive civil remedy for nondisclosures in conjunction with sale of residential property, where plaintiffs originally brought tort claims for fraud and sought rescission of the agreement
  • limiting “the right of a purchaser to recover for failure to disclose known defects in residential property to those provided in the [RPCDA] which expressly prohibits awards for exemplary damages”
  • limiting “the right of a purchaser to recover for failure to disclose known defects in residential property to those provided in the [RPCDA] which expressly prohibits awards for exemplary damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.