White v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a counseling memorandum could constitute an adverse action in combination with a notice of discipline
• finding that a reasonable jury could determine that a notice of discipline was materially adverse where it contributed to the plaintiff paying a fine to settle a disciplinary action
• noting that counseling memo and negative comment in performance evaluation might not be adverse action in themselves, but a jury could find them actionable when considered in combination with a notice of discipline
• finding evidence of animus in employer's statement that he “did not know what was wrong with [plaintiff]” after she engaged in protected speech
• “Negative reactions by an employer to a plaintiff’s complaints of discrimination have been deemed indicative of retaliatory animus.”
• “The right to be free from gender discrimination was clearly established at the time of the incidents in question.”.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).