White v. Daniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the claimed uses did not complement one another so as to constitute continuous and exclusive possession of the land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McDonnold v. Weinacht
  Texas Supreme Court· 1971-03-10· cited 97×
• Villegas v. Griffin Industries
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1998-08-20· cited 59×
• Parker v. McGinnes
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-12-03· cited 27×
• Crosby v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1967-11-02· cited 9×
• Plumb v. Stuessy
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-30· cited 6×
• Miller v. Fitzpatrick
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1967-07-13· cited 6×