Skip to main content
· 5/24/1906

White v. Columbia & Montour Electric Railway Co.

Citations

  • 215 Pa. 462
  • 64 A. 676
  • 1906 Pa. LEXIS 823

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Street railways — Passengers—Jerk of car — Province of court and jury — Exorbitant verdict — New trial.</p> <p>In an action against a street railway company by a passenger to recover damages for personal injuries, the case is for the jury where the plaintiff and her daughter testify that the car started before plaintiff had a reasonable opportunity to be seated, and that the jerk of the car threw the mother down and caused the injuries complained of.</p> <p>The appellate court will not reverse a judgment on a verdict though of opinion that it is exorbitant, where no abuse of discretion has been committed by the trial court.</p>

Judges: Elkin, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.