· 9/18/2002
White v. City of Toledo
Citations
- 217 F. Supp. 2d 838
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17534
- 2002 WL 31084639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding there is no “constitutional, statutory, or common law right that a private citizen has to require a public official to investigate or prosecute a crime.”
- finding there is no “constitutional, statutory, or common law right that a private citizen has to require a public official to investigate or prosecute a crime.”
- finding there is no “constitutional, statutory, or common law right that a private citizen has to require a public official to investigate or prosecute a crime.”
- “[A] city’s alleged failure, even if intentional, to enforce [a] speed limit does not state a § 1983 claim against a municipality.”
- victim of a crime does not have a right to have the alleged perpetrator investigated or criminally prosecuted
- “[T]he law is also clear that there is no ‘constitutional, statutory, or common law right that a private citizen has to require a public official to investigate or prosecute a crime.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.