White v. Bruck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court’s consideration of “frequency and persistence of noncompliance” indicates that “Congress envisioned situations in which debt collectors engage in multiple violations of the act”
• “There would have been no need to require that courts consider the frequency of noncompliance if Congress intended that each violation of the act could result in an award of damages up to $1,000.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).