Veterans Claims· 2/18/1994

White v. Brown

Citations

6 Vet. App. 247
1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 112
1994 WL 49632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that where there was no new and material evidence and claim should not have been reopened, Thurber error was not prejudicial and did not require remand
where claimant fails to submit new and material evidence to reopen claim under 38 U.S.C. § 5108, Board’s Thurber error is harmless and does not require remand
where claimant fails to submit new and material evidence to reopen claim under 38 U.S.C. § 5108, Board’s Thurber error is nonprejudicial and does not require remand
where claimant fails to submit new and material evidence to reopen claim under 38 U.S.C. § 5108, Board’s Thurber error is harmless and does not require remand
BVA citation of medical treatises without due notice to the appellant was harmless error, and therefore, remand is not required where no new and material evidence was submitted and the claim should not have been reopened

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Holdaway, Mankin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.