White v. Baillio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding appellant was not en- titled to relief as there was “no evidence” to support his claim
• finding appellant was not en- titled to relief as there was “no evidence” to support his claim
• finding appellant was not entitled to relief as there was “no evidence” to support his claim and this Court had “only the arguments of appellate counsel”
• finding appellant was not entitled to relief as there was “no evidence” to support his claim and this Court had “only the arguments of appellate counsel”
• error to opine that sons were “victims of incest by their father”
• plain error for expert to act as human lie detector

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).