· 11/9/2023
White, S.-R., Pets. v. Johnson, V.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a reasonable interest to assert standing for a claim under section 43(a
- finding the consumer confusion element was met where the amended complaint alleged defendants used a word or symbol for false representations of fact that was likely to deceive as to the sponsorship of approval of the goods by another person
- “We review the district court’s grant of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss de novo, accepting all factual claims in the complaint as true, and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor.”
- motion for REPORT & RECOMMENDATION judgment on the pleadings
- motion for judgment on the pleadings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.