White River Conservancy District v. Commonwealth Engineers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court erred by changing prejudgment interest rate from the 17 contract rate because evidence failed to show contract interest rate was unconscionable
• allowing appellant to raise issues in second appeal where first appeal was dismissed for failure to meet jurisdictional requirements
• determining 18% interest rate not unconscionable
• determining 18% interest rate not unconscionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).