Skip to main content
· 2/24/1915

White Plains Coal Co. v. Teague

Citations

  • 163 Ky. 110
  • 173 S.W. 360
  • 1915 Ky. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to consider a statement from a witness when ruling on summary judgment because the witness had not been identified during discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.