Whitcomb v. Rood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the parties “stipulated as to the amount of the enhanced value to the remainder which was to be a setoff against the total if that benefit was found . . . to be a special benefit”
• “[F]or benefits to be deemed special, the benefit to the remaining property must be different in kind from that of any other owner involved in the [ ] improvement and ... it is not the degree of benefit that controls.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).