Whitaker v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling Comprehensive Plan did not adversely affect landowners’ proposed project and therefore did not affect landowners’ proffered highest and best use for purposes of pre-taking valuation
• applying the Contract Disputes Act rate set forth in 41 U.S.C. § 611
• applying the Contract Disputes Act rate set forth in 41 U.S.C. § 611
• applying the Contract Disputes Act rate set forth in 41 U.S.C. § 611
• rejecting proffered uses that were “convenient arguments rather than feasible alternatives”
• “Notwithstanding the property’s designation as a nature preservation area in the city’s Comprehensive Plan, the court concludes that plaintiffs could have developed the property into a light industrial park in accordance with the city’s zoning ordinance____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).