Whitaker v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ownership of a fax machine is not a prerequisite for standing under the TCPA
• affirming class... certification :in a TCPA class action involving 10,145 persons and explaining that recipients “of faxes who don’t have rights under 'the [TCPA] just wouldn’t be entitled to share in the damages awarded to the class by a judgment or settlement”
• “But what the Act prohibits is faxing unsolicited fax advertisements ‘to a telephone facsimile machine.’ ... There is no mention of ownership.”
• “[N]o monetary loss need be shown to entitle the junk-fax recipient to statutory damages.”
• “[N]o monetary loss need be shown to entitle the junk-fax recipient to statutory damages.”
• “[N]o monetary loss need be shown to entitle the junk-fax recipient to statutory damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).