Whitaker v. Board of Higher Ed. of City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a Rule 12(b)(6) motion “because plaintiff should be given an opportunity to prove that under state law . . . he had [the] property interest” claimed under the Due Process Clause”
• primary jurisdiction and exhaustion inapplicable where Section 504 administrative enforcement mechanism ineffective for personal redress
• exhaustion not required where it would have been “meaningless and superfluous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).