Skip to main content
· 1/21/1987

Whitacre v. Halo Optical Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 501 So. 2d 994
  • 76 A.L.R. 4th 185
  • 1987 La. App. LEXIS 8495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • compression injury to eye, residual enlarged pupil and sensitivity to glare — $20,000 general damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jasper E. Jones, Norris and Lindsay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.