Whitacre v. Culver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the doctrine \does not apply in cases where there is no proof that the conduct of more than one defendant has been tortious\
• holding that the doctrine “does not apply in cases where there is no proof that the conduct of more than one defendant has been tortious”
• alternative liability applies when plaintiff sues two manufacturers of a generic chemical supplied to employer which caused his injury
• “no determination has been made as to whether either defendant committed a tortious act, or whether either defendant’s act was the proximate cause of appellant’s injuries. These issues must be decided by a trier of fact in order to apply the Restatement rule [433B].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).