District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/9/1983
Whipple v. State
Citations
- 431 So. 2d 1011
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to write opinion where “an opinion would not have been of any significant assistance to the bench or bar of this state”
- rejecting argument that district court's unelaborated per curiam affirmance of the trial court's decision thwarted right of access to the courts because the constitution's guarantee of a right to review does not extend to supreme court review
- “The fact remains, however, that most of the cases cited by zealous advocates as being in direct conflict with our PCA decisions are simply not close enough to write about.”
- \We write opinions in all reversals and remands\
- \We write opinions in all reversals and remands\
- motion should not re-argue matters already argued
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- James Harmon, Iii, 080164 v. Tom L. Barton, Robert ButterworthEleventh Circuit· 1990-02-20· cited 71×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-03-30· cited 27×
- Parker v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-10· cited 21×
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-26· cited 20×
- Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-05-27· cited 17×
- Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. ReitzesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-17· cited 12×
- Kates v. MillheiserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-13· cited 9×
- Lewis v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-25· cited 8×
- Amador v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-05· cited 8×
- Jackson v. US AVIATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-08· cited 6×
- Bardol v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-22· cited 6×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-22· cited 6×
- Patton v. State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement, ex rel. D.A.R.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-25· cited 6×
- Lowe Inv. Corp. v. ClementeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-27· cited 5×
- Snell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-02· cited 5×
- Robertson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-12· cited 3×
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-08· cited 3×
- STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. TrauthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-06· cited 2×
- Sch. Bd. of Pinellas Cty. v. Dist. Ct. of App.Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-03-14· cited 2×
- West v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-21· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-06-26· cited 93×
- Foley v. Weaver Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1965-04-28· cited 86×
- Ansin v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-03-26· cited 83×
- Lake v. LakeSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-06-11· cited 41×
- State Ex Rel. Jaytex Realty Co. v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-10-02· cited 34×
- Dodi Publishing Co. v. Editorial America, SASupreme Court of Florida· 1980-07-03· cited 30×
- FLORIDA HIGH SCH. ACTIVITIES ASS'N, INC. v. BradshawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-30· cited 18×
- In Re Certificate of Judicial Manpower, Etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-02-17· cited 7×
- Karlin v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-07-01· cited 7×
- Fortman v. FREEDOM FEDERAL SAV., ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-12-17· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.