Skip to main content
· 3/2/1918

Whipple v. Lewis

Citations

  • 69 Pa. Super. 279
  • 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 378

Syllabus

<p>Appeals — New trial — Discretion of court — Promissory note.</p> <p>The action of the court below in granting or refusing a new trial is so largely a matter of discretion, that its exercise will not be reviewed, except in a clear case of abuse of that discretion. Where it does not appeár that there was a manifest abuse of judicial discretion, an appeal cannot be sustained.</p> <p>An appeal from an order granting a new trial will not be reversed where it appears that the court below directed a verdict for plaintiff in an action on a promissory note, but subsequently granted a new trial, and there is some evidence that the transaction by which the plaintiff secured the note, was tainted with fraud, and that the plaintiff knew of the fraud.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.