· 12/31/1992
Whigham v. State
Citations
- 611 So. 2d 988
- 1993 WL 2780
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to hold trial court in error for excluding testimony of witness where no proffer was made
- \The right would be eviscerated if the government were free to make invidious reference when accused chose not to testify.\
- procedural bar applies unless error involves serious violation of constitutional right
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: En Banc
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.