Skip to main content
· 12/31/1992

Whigham v. State

Citations

  • 611 So. 2d 988
  • 1993 WL 2780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to hold trial court in error for excluding testimony of witness where no proffer was made
  • \The right would be eviscerated if the government were free to make invidious reference when accused chose not to testify.\
  • procedural bar applies unless error involves serious violation of constitutional right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.