Whether the Millennium Challenge Corporation Should Be Considered an \Agency\ for Purposes of the Open Meeting Requirements of the Sunshine Act

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that decisions published in the successive application context were binding in a direct appeal
• holding that the prior precedent rule “applies with equal force” to published decisions involving applica- tions to file second or successive habeas petitions
• holding that the prior precedent rule “applies with equal force” to published decisions involving applications to file second or successive habeas petitions
• holding that Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence under our binding precedent in Saint Fleur and Colon
• holding that attempted Hobbs Act Robbery constituted a crime of violence under Section 924(c)’s use–of–force clause because that clause expressly includes “attempted use of force”
• holding that published orders on requests for authorization to file a second or successive § 2255 motion, like Smith, are binding outside the second or successive context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).