Wheless v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the appeal was untimely, we will not consider [the c]laimant’s argument regarding the merits of the original appeal.”
• \[The c]laimant's failure to confirm a successful fax transmission contributed to the untimely appeal. Such a mistake does not qualify as `non-negligent conduct beyond [the appellant's] control.'\
• “[The c]laimant’s failure to confirm a successful fax transmission contributed to the untimely appeal. Such a mistake does not qualify as ‘non-negligent conduct beyond [the appellant’s] control.’”
• non- negligence must be beyond the claimant’s control
• the non-negligence must be beyond the claimant’s control
• non- negligence must be beyond the claimant’s control

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).