Skip to main content
· 12/6/1965

Whelchel v. Solomon

Citations

  • 254 Miss. 334
  • 180 So. 2d 642
  • 1965 Miss. LEXIS 951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff's vomiting, diarrhea, and appetite loss was not severe as a matter of law
  • holding plaintiffs vomiting, diarrhea, and appetite loss was not severe as a matter of law
  • where the character of an alleged injury is not objective, the cause and extent of the injury must be established by expert medical testimony
  • “Where physical injury . . . is not obvious to laymen, its existence may not be demonstrated solely by complaints of the alleged victim, but must also be substantiated by expert medical testimony.”
  • because the purpose of a statute regulating the licensing of nurses was to secure the safety and welfare of the general public, individual who was injured by an unlicensed nurse had no private right of action based on violation of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brady, Ethridge, Gillespie, Rodgers, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.