Wheeling Trust & Savings Bank v. Tremco Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that emission of a gas over time from materials used to install the curtain wall of an office building that resulted in etching and streaking of the windows was insufficient to satisfy sudden, dangerous or calamitous Moorman doctrine exception
• holding more than reference to the delivery address of construction materials is required to demonstrate the intent to bind the building owner as a third-party beneficiary
• finding that a purchase order’s identification of the property owner’s construction location as the place where materials were to be delivered did not make the owner an intended third-party beneficiary
• finding that a purchase order’s identification of the property owner’s construction location as the place where materials were to be delivered did not make the owner an intended third-party beneficiary
• finding that a purchase order’s identification of the property owner’s construction location as the place where materials were to be delivered did not make the owner an intended third-party beneficiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).