Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Rowing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[i]t is now well[-]established that ‘the doctrine of res judicata may be applied to quasi-judicial determinations of administrative agencies’”
• noting in context of Administrative Procedures Act, that “we give no deference to the lower court [but] review de novo whether the agency action satisfies the standards of the APA”
• noting in context of Administrative Procedures Act, that \we give no deference to the lower court [but] review de novo whether the agency action satisfies the standards of the APA\
• noting in context of Administra tive Procedures Act, that “we give no deference to the lower court [but] review de novo whether the agency action satisfies the standards of the APA.”
• ‘“Judicial admissions are formal concessions in the pleadings, or stipulations by a party or its counsel, that are binding upon the party making them.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).