Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Board of Revision of Taxes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, for purposes of federal diversity jurisdiction, “‘domicile’ and ‘citizenship’ are synonymous terms” (citation omitted)
• noting that “[t]he existence of federal jurisdiction ordinarily depends on the facts as they exist when the complaint is filed
• upholding finding of bad faith where a party “attempt[ed] to change some admissions to denials on material allegations made in the [c]omplaint” (second alteration in original)
• “[Federal] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 60(b) provides for extraordinary relief which may be granted only upon an adequate showing of exceptional circumstances.” (quoting In re Levaquin Prod. Liab. Litig., 739 F.3d 401, 404 (8th Cir. 2014)
• “[Federal] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 60(b) provides for extraordinary relief which may be granted only upon an adequate showing of exceptional circumstances.” (quoting In re Levaquin Prod. Liab. Litig., 739 F.3d 401, 404 (8th Cir. 2014)
• “[Federal] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 60(b) provides for extraordinary relief which may be granted only upon an adequate showing of exceptional circumstances.” (quoting In re Levaquin Prod. Liab. Litig., 739 F.3d 401, 404 (8th Cir. 2014))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).