Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. Tinsley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the indictment did not need to list the defendant’s possible acts as an accomplice where it alleged the death of a named victim, the date and place of death and described the stabbing that preceded the death
• “[A] defendant charged with a specific offense may effectively invoke double jeopardy protection [and] educate his counsel on whatever he knows about the offense, so that investigation, discovery and other trial preparation can begin.”
• accomplice may be convicted on proof of acts not specified in indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).