Wheeler v. Schulman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exhaustion was not required for section 1983 claims alleging violations of the Fourth and First Amendments
• “To the extent that plaintiffs seek damages for humiliation, pain and suffering, and damage to emotional well-being separate from education-related issues, those claims are independent claims that do not arise under the IDEA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).