Wheeler v. Rolling Door Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that mere filing of cross-motions for summary judgment does not obligate court to enter summary judgment; rather, court must independently determine that there are no genuine issues of material fact before entering summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Endres v. Young – Hill
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2018-04-20· cited 4×
• Thoroughbred Assoc. v. Kansas Royalty Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-02-11· cited 2×
• Law Co. Building Associates v. Law
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-07-12· cited 1×
• Antonio Ramirez v. Garay's Roofing, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-07-26· cited 1×
• University of Kansas Hospital Authority v. Board of Franklin County Comm'rs
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-06-26

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-01-25· cited 88×
• Robinett v. the Haskell Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-10-27· cited 63×
• Bright v. Cargill, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-07-10· cited 62×
• Hanna v. CRA, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1966-01-22· cited 45×
• Seabourn v. Coronado Area Council
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 25×
• Anderson v. National Carriers, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1985-02-28· cited 19×
• Rodriquez v. John Russell Construction
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-09-13· cited 9×
• Harper v. Broadway Mortuary
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1981-10-15· cited 3×