· 6/21/1979
Wheeler v. McIntyre
Citations
- 596 P.2d 798
- 100 Idaho 286
- 1979 Ida. LEXIS 437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Considering first the appealability of this order, we note that I.A.R. 11(a)(5) permits an appeal as a matter of right from ‘any order made after final judgment.’ Since the order denying the motions is one made after final judgment, it is appealable.... ”
- “Considering first the appealability of this order, we note that I.A.R. 11(a)(5) permits an appeal as a matter of right from ‘any order made after final judgment.’ Since the order denying the motions is one made after final judgment, it is appealable . . . .”
- “Since the motion for new trial, motion to alter judgment, and objections to judgment, findings and conclusions were untimely, they do not terminate the running of the 42 days in which to file notice of appeal.”
- “The ‘Motion to Alter Judgment’ was brought under Rule 59(e), and was likewise subject to the strict 1[4] day requirement of Rule 59. Since the motion was not filed within 1[4] days of entry of judgment, the court had no power to grant the requested relief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFadden, Shepard, Donaldson, Bakes, Bistline
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.