Wheeler v. Holland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment on vehicle owner-plaintiffs’ redhibition claims because “sufficient information had been disseminated by defendant (the visor warning sticker and owner’s guides) and the media to excite plaintiffs’ attention to stability concerns and the rollover problem”
• “[c]laims of fraudulent concealment generally require that . . . plaintiff did not have actual or constructive knowledge of the information . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).