Wheaton v. Fernenbaugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that trial judges are “clothed with a broad discretion” in determining the relevancy of trial phase evidence to the penalty phase
• relying on this court’s holding in Caldwell v. Russell, 181 F.3d 731, 740 (6th Cir.1999)
• Ohio state court adopting the x'easoning of Caldwell and finding that the Ohio “insanity defense does not involve the substantive elements of the criminal offense.”
• “‘[T]he denial of a motion in limine does not preserve a claimed error for review in the absence of a contemporaneous objection at trial.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).