Wheatcroft v. Albert Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in 1954, both recording statutes \were in effect\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re: Estate of Plance Appeal of: Plance, J.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-19· cited 45×
• Reed v. Wolyniec
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 23×
• Darlington Brick & Clay Products Co. v. Aino
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-09-19· cited 11×
• Graham v. Lyons
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-22· cited 3×
• Mostoller v. Pile
  Somerset County Court of Common Pleas· 1977-03-09· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Yenchko v. Grontkowski
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-05-21· cited 13×
• Daly's Estate
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-12-17· cited 5×
• Friedline v. Friedline
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-01-03· cited 3×
• Erie Coach Co. v. Erie Bus Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-04-19· cited 2×