Whatley v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the time to file a motion under RCFC 59(e) cannot be extended
• stating that because \no judgment was entered ... the timing provisions of RCFC 59(b) do not apply” and noting that \various courts construing the timing provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(b
• “[L]ike the parallel Federal rules, this court’s rules do not countenance a motion to extend the time for filing a reconsideration motion subject to the timing provision of RCFC 59(b).”
• “Because no time limits are specified in RCFC 59(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).