Whatley Ex Rel. Whatley v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that phrase “[n]one of the funds appropriated under this Act, or in appropriations Acts for subsequent fiscal years” “clearly indicate[d] that it is intended to be permanent”
• noting that phrase “[n]one of the funds appropriated under this Act, or in appropriations Acts for subsequent fiscal years” “clearly indi- cate[d] that it is intended to be permanent”
• “[T]he Calloway decision, even coupled -with the ‘temporary’ nature of appropriation act fee caps, is not sufficient to create a property interest in the excess fees, the denial of which constitutes a taking.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).